Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 441 F.3d 635 - Hannon v. Sanner

Hannon v. Sanner’s Empirical Analysis

441 F.3d 635 · 2006

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
June 2021
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently June 2021

3 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

50200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Davis v. United States · Dickerson v. United States · Michigan v. Tucker · Chavez v. Martinez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Plaintiff's] action is premised on an alleged violation of the constitutional rule announced in Miranda and subsequent decisions. The remedy for any such violation is suppression of evidence, which relief [plaintiff] ultimately obtained from the Supreme Court of Minnesota. The admission of [plaintiff's] statements in a criminal case did not cause a deprivation of any `right' secured by the Constitution, within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “The Court defined Miranda as a `constitutional decision' announcing a `constitutional rule,' but never described the Miranda safeguards as a `constitutional right' equivalent to the Fifth Amendment itself. We thus view Dickerson as maintaining the status quo of the Miranda doctrine . . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.