Yee v. Duncan’s Empirical Analysis
441 F.3d 851 · 2006
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Williams v. Taylor · Teague v. Lane · Powers v. Ohio · Purkett v. Elem
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“And [Juror # 4], unfortunately, your honor, I can’t — I can’t recall specifically what it was about [Juror #4]. I have down that he was a system analyst and that he was on a prior jury that reached a verdict and his wife was a homemaker, but other than that, to be honest, I can’t recall.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Yee v. Duncan“an example of the Supreme Court's consistent interpretation of Batson to date”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Boyd v. Newland
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.