Commonwealth v. Miranda’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
37
cited by 37 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited
37 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Commonwealth v. Latimore · Opinions of the Justices to the House of Representatives · Timberlake v. United States · James v. United States · United States v. Fleishman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““have gone forward on the repeat-offender component of the second indictment. Principles of double jeopardy would not have operated to prevent the judge from finding the defendant guilty of distribution of heroin as a second or subsequent offense under the sentence enhancement component of the second indictment.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Commonwealth v. Owen“to be tried ... first, on the underlying substantive crime and, then, in a separate proceeding, on that component of the charge referring to the crime as a second or subsequent offense”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Commonwealth v. Ruiz“a person who acts as a lookout while others are engaged in a criminal enterprise can be convicted on a joint enterprise theory”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.