In Re Seitz’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
4
states following
November 2007
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“with sexual overtones with his secretary/court reporter, issued orders contrary to those issued by the administrative judge and, when those orders were not followed, held persons in contempt of court, accused his colleague of obstruction of justice and requested that the prosecutor bring criminal charges against him and treated employees of the court with disrespect and refused to work with certain individuals. The court found that the judge's actions conjured up”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“specific impressions of belligerence, vindictiveness, hostility, bitterness, disrespectfulness, and considerable perversity of will and motive.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“`master's ability to observe the witnesses' demeanor and comment on their credibility,'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Noecker
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.