Glover v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently October 2005
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Simmons v. United States · Sawyer v. State · McPhearson v. State · Lewis v. State · Lund v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) a loaded or unloaded firearm; or (2) a weapon, device, taser or electronic stun weapon, equipment, chemical substance, or other material that in the manner it is used, or could ordinarily be used, or is intended to be used, is readily capable of causing serious bodily injury.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Clark v. State · Hart v. State“where different conclusions can be reached as to whether or not the weapon is deadly, it is a question of fact for the jury to determine from the description of the weapon, the manner of its use and the cireumstances of the case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Miller v. State“permissible for a law enforcement officer to present a suspect for identification within a few hours of the commission of the crime.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lyles v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.