Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 441 NW2D 395 - State v. Watts

State v. Watts’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
June 2000
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Robinson · State v. O'CONNELL · State v. Hall · State v. Fuhrmann · State v. Chadwick

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To determine if a statement is spontaneous, the trial court must consider the circumstances under which the statements were made. Relevant factors include the nature of the startling event, whether the use of questions led to statements which otherwise would not have been made, the age and condition of the declarant, the subject matter of the statements used, and the lapse of time. No one factor is conclusive on whether a statement is admissible.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Oh, my God. What happened to you? Did [your boyfriend] do this?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.