Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 441 NW2D 475 - State v. Shoop

State v. Shoop’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
2
states following
April 2014
most recently cited

37 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently April 2014 · most notably State v. Usee (2011), State v. Swanson (2006)

37 state decisions

2301989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gideon v. Wainwright · Chambers v. Maroney · Tumey v. State of Ohio · Rose v. Clark · United States v. Hasting

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A conviction cannot be had upon the testimony of an accomplice, unless it is corroborated by such other evidence as tends to convict the defendant of the commission of the offense, and the corroboration is not sufficient if it merely shows the commission of the offense or the circumstances thereof.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[a]n accomplice instruction `must be given in any criminal case in which any witness against the defendant might reasonably be considered an accomplice to the crime.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “If, after an analysis of the record and a consideration of all relevant factors, we conclude that the erroneous omission of the instruction might have prompted the jury, which is presumed to be reasonable, to reach a harsher verdict than it might have otherwise reached, defendant must be awarded a new trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.