Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 441 P3D 511 - State v. Pollman

State v. Pollman’s Empirical Analysis

2019

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 2022
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · North Carolina v. Alford · Armour & Co. v. Wantock · Illinois v. Lidster · State v. Pabst

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “severance of factual predicate from legal holding conflicts with appropriate judicial reasoning ... and can easily lead to erroneous outcomes.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.