441 So. 2d 648 - State v. Mattox’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
January 1996
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 110 So. 2d 654 - Williams v. State · Jaramillo v. State · 333 So. 2d 51 - State v. Hayes · State v. Upton · 243 So. 2d 587 - State v. Davis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“defendant's fingerprint was placed at the point of entry at the time of the burglary; that the fingerprints were in a location where one engaged in a burglary could have placed them; that the relative location of where the prints were found does not give rise to the reasonableness of prior access; and that the defendant had no authorization to be on the premises”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Walker v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.