Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 441 S.W.2d 524 - Angelo v. Biscamp

Angelo v. Biscamp’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
March 2015
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently March 2015

13 state decisions

50196919701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rio Bravo Oil Co. v. Weed · McKelvy v. Barber · Cantley v. Gulf Production Co. · Coxl v. Campbell · McKee v. E. R. Stewar

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is our conclusion that this doctrine was conceived and intended to apply to relatively narrow strips of land, small in size and value in comparison to the adjoining tract conveyed by the grantor. In these instances, when it is apparent that the narrow strip has ceased to be of benefit or importance to the grantor of the larger tract, it can be presumed that the grantor intended to convey such a strip.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.