Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 441 SW2D 532 - Ex parte Burns

Ex parte Burns’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
January 2002
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ex Parte Young · Ex Parte Prestridge · Neitzke v. State · 169 Tex. Crim. 565 - Ex Parte Williams · Newton v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Art. 10a ... provides that before a defendant who has no attorney can agree to waive a jury the court must appoint an attorney to represent him. This provision is mandatory and applies whether the defendant is indigent or not. Failure to comply renders the conviction void”). . Appellant states in his Petition for Discretionary Review that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.