United States v. Binet’s Empirical Analysis
442 F.2d 296 · 1971
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1708 · 18 U.S.C. § 5035
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Chapman v. State of California · Bruton v. United States · United States v. Wade · Mapp v. Ohio
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]n no case shall such detention be for a longer period than is necessary to produce the juvenile before a committing magistrate.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Treatment of an accused juvenile after arrest as a chattel in the possession of the officers, deliverable at will to the inspectors’ offices for interrogation is a plain departure from the command of the statute for forthwith production of the juvenile before a magistrate. Statements taken while the statute is being ignored in this fashion must be held inadmissible.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.