Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

442 F.2d 384

Docket Docket 34526.

United States v. Binet

Second Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided January 1, 1971

Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1971

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently January 1971

2 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 5035

Relies on United States v. Binet · Griffith v. Warden, Nevada State Prison

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1971

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Robert Kasanoff, Robert H. Levy, Phylis Skloot Bamberger, New York City, for appellant.

¶2Rudolph W. Giuliani, Asst. U. S. Atty., Whitney North Seymour, Jr., U. S. Atty., for United States.

¶3Before WATERMAN, MOORE and HAYES, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM:

¶5Pursuant to our order upon the petitition for rehearing, reported at 442 F.2d 302, Judge Irving Ben Cooper, the trial judge, held an evidentiary hearing in order to develop the facts bearing upon the issue of delay prior to appellant’s arraignment. His findings and opinion have been delivered to the court, and we affirm the disposition he made and enter judgment in accord therewith.

¶6He found that appellant’s detention was for a “longer period than [was] necessary to produce the juvenile before a committing magistrate,’’ 18 U.S.C. § 5035.

¶7Accordingly, the order we entered after our original disposition of this case, reported at 442 F.2d 296, 300, is reinstated. We are informed that the Government has no objection to our immediate issuance of our mandate.

¶8In accord with our original opinion the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for a new trial.

¶9Mandate to issue forthwith.

/442/f2d/384 · .json · Public domain