Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 442 F.2d 625 - Bert Leroy Hunter v. Harold R. Swenson, Warden

Bert Leroy Hunter v. Harold R. Swenson, Warden’s Empirical Analysis

442 F.2d 625 · 1971

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
May 1986
most recently cited

11 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Townsend v. Sain · Brady v. United States · Jackson v. Denno · Malloy v. Hogan · Bram v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Q. After talking to Mr. Lance didn’t you go back down and talk to Mr. Hunter and tell him what Mr. Lance had told you to say ? A. Yes. I just repeated what he told me to say. Q. Didn’t Mr. Lance tell you to say that if he would cooperate it’s possible, very possible that they would consider a lesser charge? A. That’s right. Q. Then you told Mr. Hunter that? A. I said “it’s possible.” Q. You said it’s possible, it’s possible that Mr. Lance would consider a lesser charge if he would cooperate? You relayed that message to Mr. Hunter ? A. I did. Q. Those were words spoken by Mr. Lance that you relayed to Mr. Hunter in the Atchison County Jail? A. Right. Q. Prior to the time of the statement? A. Yes, sir (M.Tr. 27-28).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “that the material facts were not adequately developed at the state court hearing....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.