Suprun v. Gonzales’s Empirical Analysis
442 F.3d 1078 · 2006
Citation profile
12 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Lie v. Ashcroft · Regalado-Garcia v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Eta-Ndu v. Gonzales · Ming Ming Wijono v. Gonzales · Menjivar v. Gonzales
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a harm to be inflicted either by the government of a country or by persons or an organization that the government was unable or unwilling to control.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.