In Re: Marvin Lee Wilson’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently June 2025 · most notably Ex Parte Blue (2007), In Re: Robert Madrid Salazar, Movant (2006)
2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Rose v. Lundy · Duncan v. Walker · Atkins v. Virginia · Pace v. Superintendent State Correctional Institution at Graterford · George Duncan Superintendent Great Meadow Correctional Facility v. Sherman Walker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he state court findings concerning the Atkins claim are wholly irrelevant to our inquiry as to whether [Henderson] has made a prima facie showing of entitlement to proceed with his federal habeas application, which is an inquiry distinct from the burden that [Henderson] must bear in proving his claim in the district court.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“is applied restrictively and ... is entertained only in cases presenting rare and exceptional circumstances where it is necessary to preserve a plaintiff's claims when strict application of the statute of limitations would be inequitable.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]he Texas two-forum rule reasonably caused [Wilson] to delay filing a state habeas [petition] leaving himself only one day after the state court ruling to obtain authorization and file a federal habeas petition.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.