Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

442 F. App'x 26

In re Fleming

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided August 4, 2011

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2011-08-04

Decided 2011-08-04

¶1Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

¶2Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

¶3Derek Marquis Fleming petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on a motion for reconsideration filed in his criminal case. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court has denied Fleming’s motion. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Fleming’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We also deny as moot Fleming’s motions to expedite. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶4 PETITION DENIED.

/442/fappx/26 · .json · Public domain