Toomey v. Young’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently February 1997
7 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Morrissey v. Brewer · Moody v. Daggett · United States v. Mississippi · United States ex rel. Buono v. Kenton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A summons or warrant may be issued only within the prisoner’s maximum term or terms except that in the case of a prisoner released as if on parole pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4164 , such summons or warrant may be issued only within the maximum term or terms, less one-hundred eighty days.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Booze v. Thomas“A warrant for the apprehension of any mandatory releasee shall be issued only within the maximum term or terms for which the prisoner was sentenced, less one hundred eighty days.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Booze v. Thomas
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.