Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 442 Md. 446 - Simpson v. State

Simpson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Chapman v. State of California · Griffin v. California · Berger v. United States · Malloy v. Hogan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Based on [the prosecutor’s] suggestion that my client is going to state — to stand up in front of you and admit to all of the offenses, you’re saying, wait a minute, that doesn’t make sense, something doesn’t make sense here; if he’s guilty, why don’t, you know, you say he’s guilty and let us all go about our business. Well, there’s something that was not entirely clear from the State’s opening statement, because what she’s referring to is a so-called confession that my client gave. Let’s talk about this so-called confession which the State — and I believe they even used the word. They acted like he’s going to come up here and testify in front of you, as if he did all of these things. My client, on May 16, 2010, signed a statement, and that’s what [the State] was referring to. The statement referred to the three incidents. If you look at this statement ... the problem is, first, that as to the ... the first two incidents — there’s no evidence, other than this statement, that my client had anything to do with those incidents.... The other problem is, if you look at the statement, it is so vague that it does not have the ring of truth.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.