Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 442 P3D 138 - Lipsitz v. State

Lipsitz v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2019

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Crawford v. Washington · Maryland v. Craig · Old Aztec Mine, Inc. v. Brown · Maresca v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment provides that a criminal defendant may not be prosecuted if he or she lacks competence to stand trial.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he Confrontation Clause reflects a preference for face-toface confrontation at trial, but that preference 'must occasionally give way to considerations of public policy and the necessities of the case.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “procedure [may] be used only after the trial court hears evidence and makes a case-specific finding that the procedure is necessary to further an important state interest”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.