STATE v. WALLACE’s Empirical Analysis
2019
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2026
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Leon · Franks v. Delaware · Florida v. Jimeno · Ohio v. Robinette · Segura v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“insufficient as overly broad, not supported by probable cause, and/or [the affidavit in support] contained false, speculative, or perhaps mistaken representations by [the detective] to the examining magistrate.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. STATE v. WALLACE“I. The seizure of Appellee's cellular phone was supported by probable cause and thus a reasonable seizure. II. The District Court's findings are in error and not supported by the law or the facts in the record.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. STATE v. WALLACE“[u]pon a pretrial order, decision or judgment suppressing or excluding evidence in cases alleging violation of any provisions of Section 13.1 of Title 21 of the Oklahoma Statutes.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. STATE v. WALLACE
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.