Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 442 Pa. Super. 348 - Commonwealth v. Viera

442 Pa. Super. 348 - Commonwealth v. Viera’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
January 2014
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently January 2014

16 state decisions

100199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Tuladziecki · Styer v. Hugo · Commonwealth v. Klinghoffer · Shiomos v. STATE EMP. RETIREMENT BD. · Commonwealth v. Jones

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]n abuse of discretion may result where the trial court improperly weighed the probative value of evidence admitted against its potential for prejudicing the defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.