Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 442 So. 2d 102 - Mims v. Mims

442 So. 2d 102 - Mims v. Mims’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
6
states following
September 2008
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2008

19 state decisions

130198319902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 659 (§ 459 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Jeffcoat v. Jeffcoat · 382 So. 2d 1135 - Dobbins v. Getz Exterminators of Ala., Inc. · 413 So. 2d 1154 - L. W. Limbaugh Mining & Construction Co. v. Youngblood · Kendrick v. Kendrick · 413 So. 2d 1157 - Ex Parte Pedigo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Payments of benefits due or to become due under any law administered by the Veterans' Administration shall not be assignable except to the extent specifically authorized by law, and such payment made to, or on account of, a beneficiary shall be exempt from taxation, shall be exempt from the claim of creditors, and shall not be liable to attachment, levy, or seizure by or under any legal or equitable process whatever, either before or after receipt by the beneficiary."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “exempt[ion] from the claims of creditors.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.