Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 442 So. 2d 164 - Moore v. State

442 So. 2d 164 - Moore v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
3
states following
January 2020
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently January 2020

19 state decisions

8019831990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 391 So. 2d 677 - Ex Parte Dolvin · Bracewell v. State · 358 So. 2d 1050 - Estes v. State · 374 So. 2d 910 - Commander v. State · 358 So. 2d 1057 - Estes v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(4) the instrument used in conducting the test was in good working condition and the test was conducted in such a manner as to secure accurate results.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““(1) that the motorist was lawfully arrested before being directed to submit to a test, (2) that the law enforcement officer had reasonable grounds to believe that the motorist was driving under the influence, (3) that the test administered was designated by the proper law enforcement agency, Alabama Code § 32-5-192(a), (4) that the test was performed ‘according to methods approved by the [department of forensic sciences],’ and (5) [that the test was performed] ‘by an individual possessing a valid permit issued by the [department of forensic sciences] for this purpose.’ Alabama Code 1975, § 32-5A-194(a)(l).””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “'[I]t was necessary for the State to establish that procedures were followed which would insure the reliability of the test results. In order for the test results to be reliable, and thus relevant to the matter at issue, the results must be from generally accepted tests conducted under conditions which do not impeach the reliability of the testing procedure. ' (Emphasis added.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.