¶1The lower court’s order denying petitioner’s 3.850 motion is affirmed. This affirmance is not based upon a consideration of the merits of Bryant’s motion, but solely upon the lower court’s lack of jurisdiction to consider the collateral relief motion while an appeal from Bryant’s conviction is pending in this court. Harpham v. State, 415 So.2d 863 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982); Fick v. State, 388 So.2d 1352 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).
442 So. 2d 309
Bryant v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 1, 1983
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1983-12-01
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently October 1995
3 state decisions
Relies on 415 So. 2d 863 - Hurst v. State · Fick v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1983-12-01
View the full empirical analysis of this case →