¶1 ORDER
¶2Jonathan Davis appeals his conviction of one count of second-degree burglary, § 569.170, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction. Having reviewed the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment of conviction. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal, published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.
¶3Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).