Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

442 S.W.3d 202

State v. Jackson

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 16, 2014

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2014-09-16

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently July 2018

4 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2014-09-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Brandon Jackson (“Defendant”) appeals from a judgment on a jury verdict finding him guilty of one count of robbery in the first degree, in violation of Section 569.020, RSMo (2000), and one corresponding count of armed criminal action (“ACA”), in violation of Section 571.015.

¶3We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

¶4The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

/442/sw3d/202 · .json · Public domain