United States v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
443 F.2d 1278 · 1971
Citation profile
24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
August 1978
most recently cited
19 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 50 U.S.C. § 3811
Relies on McGautha v. California · United States v. Lloyd · United States v. Baker · Rusk v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[i]t is not the function of this court to undertake a full-scale review of administrative procedure, or to establish arbitrary time deadlines. Where the regulations provide such deadlines, they will be enforced. Otherwise, in the absence of intentional delay, discriminatory treatment, or favoritism, the administrative action will be upheld.” Id. at 1280 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““A registrant may rely upon improper processing of higher priority registrants in defending a criminal prosecution if he can establish (1) that his local board violated a specific regulation, and (2) that the result was to delay significantly the time when higher priority registrants became fully acceptable for induction.” 443 F.2d, at 1280 3”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.