United States v. Haili’s Empirical Analysis
443 F.2d 1295 · 1971
Citation profile
65 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 74 later decisions — most recently September 2014 · most notably United States v. Cook (1979), United States v. Baxter (1973)
65 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1732 · 47 U.S.C. § 605
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Glasser v. United States · Bruton v. United States · Simmons v. United States · Alderman v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 74 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The scope of cross-examination is within the discretion of the trial court and limitation will not result in reversal unless it is clear that the defendant was denied his constitutional right of confrontation. Enciso v. United States, 370 F.2d 749 (9th Cir. 1967).””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“In any event, the error alleged is harmless since [the defendant] admitted [the same information].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.