Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

443 F.2d 1359

Docket No. 26570.

Hunter v. Allen

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1971-07-22

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently October 1971

6 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Perez v. Ledesma · Demich, Inc. v. Ferdon · Embry v. Allen

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1971-07-22

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Howard Moore, Jr., Peter E. Rindskopf, Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Henry L. Bowden, Martin McFarland, Atlanta, Ga., for defendants-appellees.

Before COLEMAN and GODBOLD, Citcuit Judges, and SCOTT, District judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

The Supreme Court of the United States, on March 29, 1971, in Embry et al. v. Allen, etc., et al., 401 U.S. 989, 91 S.Ct. 1237, 28 L.Ed.2d 528 (1971), having reversed the judgment of this court in Hunter v. Allen, 422 F.2d 1158 (5th Cir. 1970), and remanded the cause to this court; it is ordered and adjudged by this court that this cause be and the same is hereby remanded to the United States District Court for further proceedings in conformity with the opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court.

/443/f2d/1359 · .json · Public domain