Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 443 F.2d 144 - United States v. Noa

United States v. Noa’s Empirical Analysis

443 F.2d 144 · 1971

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
February 2017
most recently cited

27 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2017 · most notably Schneckloth v. Bustamonte (1973), California v. Prysock (1981)

27 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions

24019711980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1708

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · United States v. Radio Television News Directors Ass'n · Gotthelf v. Commissioner · Ratcliff v. Bruce · Detenber v. American Universal Insurance Co

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “You have the right to talk to a lawyer for advice before we ask you any questions and to have him with you during questioning. If you cannot afford a lawyer, one will be appointed for you if you wish.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]his is not a case in which the defendant was not informed of his right to the presence of an attorney during questioning . . . or in which the offer of an appointed attorney was associated with a future time in court. . . .”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the reference to the right to appointed counsel immediately followed the reference to the right to consult with an attorney before and during questioning”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.