Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 443 F.2d 311 - Monteiro v. Picard

Monteiro v. Picard’s Empirical Analysis

443 F.2d 311 · 1971

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
2
states following
September 2008
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently September 2008

9 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions

1201971198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · United States v. Wade · Stovall v. Denno · Gilbert v. California · Harrington v. California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The district court was correct when it found that the admissible evidence was ‘almost certain to have produced a conviction.’ From the record before us, we ‘are able to declare a belief that [admission of the two tainted identifications] was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.’ Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 24 , 87 S.Ct. 824, 828 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967); Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250 , 89 S.Ct. 1726 , 23 L.Ed.2d 284 (1969).” (brackets theirs).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.