Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 443 F.2d 334 - Subilosky v. Moore

Subilosky v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis

443 F.2d 334 · 1971

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
August 1984
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 2 district · 8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Gideon v. Wainwright · Escobedo v. Illinois · Harrington v. California · Burgett v. Texas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We do not feel on the record as a • whole that there has been any miscarriage of justice, of a constitutional nature or otherwise. In the light of the relative insignificance of the admission of the defendant’s uncounseled conviction and the persuasiveness of the other evidence offered by the Commonwealth, we conclude that the trial court’s error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.