Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

443 F.2d 371

Docket No. 30621

United States v. Piper

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1971-05-06

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently April 1973

8 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York · United States v. Freed · United States v. Margraf

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1971-05-06

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

George H. McCleskey, Dallas, Tex., court appointed, for defendant-appellant.

Seagal v. Wheatley, U.S. Atty., John G. Truelson, Asst. U.S. Atty., W.D. Tex., San Antonio, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before THORNBERRY, MORGAN and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Thomas James Piper, Jr. was charged with and convicted of possessing in violation of 26 U.S.C. 5861(d) and (i), and 5871, a firearm that was not identified by a serial number and that was not registered to him in the National Firearms Registration and Transfer Record. In this appeal Piper argues that the provisions of the National Firearms Act violate the Self-Incrimination Clause of the Fifth Amendment. Recently this argument was rejected as without merit by the Supreme Court in United States v. Freed et al., 401 U.S. 601, 91 S.Ct. 1112, 28 L.Ed.2d 356 (1971), an opinion that is determinative of the instant matter. Accordingly, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.1

¶2

Affirmed.

/443/f2d/371 · .json · Public domain