Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 443 F.2d 803 - Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,068 C. G. Johnson v. Herbert L. Wiggs

Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,068 C. G. Johnson v. Herbert L. Wiggs’s Empirical Analysis

443 F.2d 803 · 1971

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
July 2004
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently July 2004

11 federal appellate · 3 district ·

1301971198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Coates v. Securities & Exchange Commission · Securities & Exchange Commission v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co. · Teague v. Regional Commissioner of Customs · 99 F. Supp. 808 - Speed v. Transamerica Corp. · Hafner v. Forest Laboratories, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Wiggs was entitled to assume that Johnson, Western Reserve’s second largest shareholder, and Tyler, his financial ad-visor, were aware of both the acquisition of Universal ComputaData, and the “pink sheet” quotes of the stock on March 25, 1968, when Johnson made his offer to sell. The information was in the public domain. The acquisition was previously reported in the area newspapers, and on a local television station which gave financial news ... This being so, there was no duty or obligation on the part of Wiggs to disclose. He was not required to say that which had been publicly proclaimed in several ways on several occasions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.