Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

443 F.2d 921

Docket No. 26319.

Robert Andre v. Stanley R. Resor, Secretary of the Army

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1971-06-11

2 counsel of record

Relies on Gutknecht v. United States · Breen v. Selective Service Local Board No. 16

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1971-06-11

How this case has been cited

Cited by 111 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2010 · most notably Estelle v. Gamble (1976), Johnson v. Glick (1973)

38 federal appellate · 15 district · 5 state decisions

62019711980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Richard Locke, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), James L. Browning, Jr., U.S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for appellants.

Michael Sorgen (argued), Mark Susnow, San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before KOELSCH, ELY and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

The order of the United States District Court, directing that a writ of habeas corpus issue, is affirmed.1

¶2

Robert Andre, the petitioner-appellee, is presently serving in the armed forces of the United States pursuant to a Selective Service Board order to report for induction, based upon the delinquency regulations appearing in 32 CFR part 1642, which purport to vest a Board with power to accelerate induction of delinquent registrants.

¶3

But those regulations, to the extent they provided for such induction, lacked legislative authorization. Gutknecht v. United States, 396 U.S. 295, 90 S.Ct. 506, 24 L.Ed.2d 532 (1970). Hence the Board's order was void and petitioner is entitled to his discharge.

¶4

The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Notes:

/443/f2d/921 · .json · Public domain