Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 443 F.2d 965 - H. F. Campbell Company (Formerly H. F. Campbell Construction Company) v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

H. F. Campbell Company (Formerly H. F. Campbell Construction Company) v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
December 2019
most recently cited

7 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently December 2019 · most notably Southern Pacific Transp. Co. v. Commissioner (1980), Wayne Bolt & Nut Co. v. Commissioner (1989)

7 federal appellate ·

14019711980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Duberstein D Stanton · Gotthelf v. Commissioner · Caldwell v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Caldwell · Robert A. Henningsen, and Cross and R.A. And Margaret Henningsen v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, And · Biggs v. Commissioner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Except as otherwise expressly provided in this chapter, a taxpayer who changes the method of accounting on the basis of which he regularly computes his income in keeping his books shall, before computing his taxable income under the new method, secure the consent of the Secretary or his delegate.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “to be necessary solely by reason of the change [in accounting method] in order to prevent amounts from being duplicated or omitted”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.