Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 443 F.3d 1362 - Espy v. Massac

Espy v. Massac’s Empirical Analysis

443 F.3d 1362 · 2006

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
February 2013
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Crawford v. Washington · Gideon v. Wainwright · Teague v. Lane · Ohio v. Roberts · Schriro Director Arizona Department of Corrections v. Summerlin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Although the rule announced in Crawford also impacts the accuracy of criminal convictions, it does not qualify as a `watershed' rule in the mold of Gideon. Crawford merely altered the existing regime outlined by White, 502 U.S. at 355-56, 112 S. Ct. at 742-43, and Roberts, 448 U.S. at 65 , 100 S. Ct. at 2539 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.