Denney v. Deutsche Bank AG’s Empirical Analysis
443 F.3d 253 · 2006
Citation profile
52 federal appellate · 16 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 213 later decisions — most recently June 2025 · most notably In Re Tobacco II Cases (2009), Mazza v. American Honda Motor Co. (2012)
52 federal appellate · 16 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Warth v. Seldin · Allen v. Wright · Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. Camp · Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 213 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'may simply be the fear or anxiety of future harm.'”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“`be defined in such a way that anyone within it would have standing[,]' and ... a named plaintiff cannot represent a class of persons who lack the ability to bring suit themselves.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“[N]o class may be certified that contains members lacking Article III standing.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.