Manicki v. Zeilmann’s Empirical Analysis
443 F.3d 922 · 2006
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Lawlor v. National Screen Service Corp. · 184 Ill. 2d 290 - River Park, Inc. v. City of Highland Park · Herrmann v. Cencom Cable Associates, Inc. · Davis v. Dallas Area Rapid Transit · Lane v. Peterson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`[T]wo claims are one for purposes of res judicata if they are based on the same, or nearly the same, factual allegations.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“for in that event separate suits against them are treated as the equivalent of separate suits against the same party”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Rucker v. Schmidt
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.