Laskowski v. Spellings’s Empirical Analysis
443 F.3d 930 · 2006
Citation profile
12 federal appellate ·
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 31 U.S.C. § 3701 (Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996) · 33 U.S.C. § 1321 · 33 U.S.C. § 409
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc. · Friends of the Earth Incorporateds v. Laidlaw Environmental Services Inc · Flast v. Cohen · Lemon v. Kurtzman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The Supreme Court has steadfastly refused to expand Flast and has never recognized private party repayment to the Treasury as an appropriate remedy for an Establishment Clause violation in a suit based on taxpayer standing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Winkler v. Gates
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.