Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 443 FSUPP 1257 - DeGregorio v. Segal

DeGregorio v. Segal’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
January 2020
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently January 2020

4 federal appellate · 1 district ·

80197819801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 15 (§ 4 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914) · 15 U.S.C. § 26 (§ 16 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396 (§ 1900 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Warth v. Seldin · Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Commission · United States v. Grinnell Corp. · National Association for Advancement of Colored People v. State of Alabama Patterson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In light of the allegations that PWRO members are being denied needed nursing facilities care which places their lives and health in serious jeopardy, the association has adequately asserted “injury to its members of sufficient immediacy and ripeness to warrant judicial intervention.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “failed to demonstrate that Each member would have standing or that individual participation would not be necessary.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.