Commonwealth v. Charros’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
23
cited by 23 later decisions
2
states following
August 2018
most recently cited
23 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Gerstein v. Pugh · United States v. Watson · Michigan v. Summers · Fahy v. Connecticut · Commonwealth v. Latimore
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“authority [to detain these persons] is incidental to, and exists contemporaneously with, the execution of the warrant”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“arises from necessity, that is, from the need to control the inherent volatility produced by the search environment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the interest of the safety of all involved.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.