Cronk v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
January 2024
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Mincey v. Arizona · Sedillo v. United States · Michigan v. Tyler · Relford v. Commandant, U. S. Disciplinary Barracks
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Once a defendant inquires into a subject on cross-examination, the state is entitled to probe the matter further on redirect to avert a false or misleading impression. Estep v. State, (1979) [271] Ind. [525], 394 N.E.2d 111 . Once a party opens a subject on cross-examination, the opposing party may pursue that subject on redirect examination. Woodford v. State, (1980) [273] Ind. [487], 405 N.E.2d 522 . [Defendant] Cronk, having opened this issue, could not have it closed at his convenience. Drollinger v. State, (1980) [274] Ind. [99], 409 N.E.2d 1084 ."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Whitehead v. State · Smith v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.