Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 443 N.E.2d 95 - Front v. Lane

Front v. Lane’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
December 2003
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently December 2003

6 state decisions

40198219902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chustak v. Northern Indiana Public Service Co. · Hayworth v. Bromwell · Clouse v. Fielder · 182 Ind. App. 150 - Leistikow v. Hoosier State Bank of Indiana

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"... a demand for trial by jury made as herein provided may not be withdrawn without the consent of the other party or parties."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.