Deuschle v. Bak Construction Co.’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Permann v. South Dakota Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance Division · Application of Northwestern Bell Tel. Co. · Lawler v. Windmill Restaurant · Holmes v. Bruce Motor Freight, Inc. · Finck v. Northwest School District No. 52-3
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he testimony of professionals is crucial in establishing this causal relationship because the field is one in which laymen ordinarily are unqualified to express an opinion. Unless its nature and effect are plainly apparent, an injury is a subjective condition requiring an expert opinion to establish a causal relationship between the incident and the injury or disability.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“`a possibility is insufficient and a probability is necessary.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.