Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 443 Pa. Super. 479 - Commonwealth v. Williams

443 Pa. Super. 479 - Commonwealth v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
states following
August 2014
most recently cited

25 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 413 Pa. Super. 42 - Commonwealth v. Hollawell · 434 Pa. Super. 309 - Commonwealth v. Anderson · 391 Pa. Super. 287 - Commonwealth v. Beasley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) Credit against the maximum term and any minimum term shall be given to the defendant for all time spent in custody as a result of the criminal charge for which a prison sentence is imposed or as a result of the conduct on which such a charge is based.... (2) Credit against the maximum term and any minimum term shall be given to the defendant for all time spent in custody under a prior sentence if he is later reprosecuted and resentenced for the same offense or for another offense based on the same act or acts....”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he 3/£ to 7 year term imposed on [revocation of probation] was the maximum sentence allowed by law for that offense. Thus, if appellant is not credited with the 23 months already served, his sentence for attempted theft by unlawful taking would be 65 months (or 5 years and 5 months) to 107 months (or 8 years and 11 months). Clearly this sentence is illegal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “is limited to the validity of the revocation proceeding and the legality of the final judgment of sentence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.