443 Pa. Super. 507 - Commonwealth v. Rico’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
August 2003
most recently cited
3 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Hernandez v. New York · Powers v. Ohio · Purkett v. Elem · Castaneda v. Partida
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If any identifiable group is excluded on the basis of race, gender, ethnicity, or other reason not related to a perception that the individual member would be unable to adequately perform the functions and duties required of a juror in the case presented, impermissible discrimination has occurred.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Commonwealth v. Rico
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.