Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 443 Pa. Super. 602 - Commonwealth v. Noll

443 Pa. Super. 602 - Commonwealth v. Noll’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

64
cited by 64 later decisions
2
states following
April 2021
most recently cited

64 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 64 later decisions — most recently April 2021 · most notably Commonwealth v. Baumhammers (2008), Commonwealth v. Harris (2011)

64 state decisions

3501995200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hickman v. Taylor · United States v. Nobles · Kremer v. Grant · United States v. Kovel · Commonwealth v. Cohen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 64 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It would be patently unfair for the Commonwealth to base its reconstruction of the crash on information which its expert gathered while employed in the same capacity by Mr. Noll. There is no possible curative instmction in this situation. It would be impossible to point to particular portions of [the expert’s] testimony which must be stricken or provide some general missive directing the jury to view the expert’s testimony with caution. In addition, there is no particular prejudice to the Commonwealth from this ruling. Competent accident reconstruction experts are plentiful. There was absolutely no need to employ as the Commonwealth’s expert someone who had previously investigated the accident for Mr. Noll.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““As attorneys must often rely on the assistance of investigators and other agents in the compilation of materials necessary for trial, the doctrine protects materials prepared by agents for the attorney, as well as those prepared by the attorney himself.” Id. (citations omitted)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “opposing counsel from referring to or offering into evidence matters so highly prejudicial to the moving party that curative instructions cannot alleviate an adverse effect on the jury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.