Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

443 So. 2d 1065

Plasencia v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 17, 1984

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1984-01-17

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently September 1987

1 state decisions

Relies on Hialeah, Inc. v. Bell · 395 So. 2d 1175 - Pressley v. State · 297 So. 2d 317 - Bolin v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1984-01-17

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The appellant was charged by information with second degree murder. A jury found him guilty as charged. He was sentenced to fifteen years in the state prison.

¶2The sole point raised by appellant in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in denying appellant’s motions for directed verdict at the conclusion of the state’s case and for judgment of acquittal because of insufficiency of the evidence.

¶3After carefully considering the point on appeal in the light of the record and briefs, we have concluded that no reversible error has been demonstrated. See: Pressley v. State, 395 So.2d 1175 (Fla. 3d DCA), pet for rev. denied, 407 So.2d 1105 (Fla.1981); Everett v. State, 339 So.2d 704 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Bolin v. State, 297 So.2d 317 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 304 So.2d 452 (Fla.1974); Gil v. State, 266 So.2d 43 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 271 So.2d 139 (Fla. 1972).

¶4Therefore the judgment and sentence are affirmed.

¶5Affirmed.

/443/so2d/1065 · .json · Public domain